Mohammad Halim v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPPIL No. 56 of 2015
1. Mohammad Halim S/o Late Mohd. Shafi, aged about 62 years, R/o. Junior MIG-705 A, Vaishali Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Mantralaya, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Collector (Food), Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
3. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh)
4. Assistant Commissioner and Nodal Office (Food), Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh)
5. Ishwar Sao, President, Prathmik Shahkari Upbhokta Bhandar, IDI 431004004, Ward No.2, Junwani (Kosanala), Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh)
6. Gulab Bai, President, Shraddha Jagriti Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh, Ward No.4, I.D.No.431004012, Laxmi Nagar, Near Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh),
7. Hari Bhau Galfat, President, Panchsil Prathmik Sahkari, Upbhokta Bhandar, Ward No.26, I.D.No.431004076, Shyam Nagar, Near Jawar Market, Power House Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg (Chhattisgarh),
8. Jai Kumar Gupta President Shakti Prathmik Upbhokta Bhandar Ward No.3, I.D.No.431004066, Near Mudkatta School, Sharda Para Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg (Chhattisgarh),
9. Devilal Sahu, President, Manas Prathmik Upbhokta Bhandar, Ward No. 23, I.D.No.431004068, Near Mudkatta School, Sharda Para Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 10.Mahavir Prasad, President, Janshakti Prathmik Upbhokta Bhandar, Ward No.22, I.D.No.431004070, Near Govt. Hospital Santoshi Para, Camp-2, Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner - Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents 1 and 2 - Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Additional Advocate General.
For Respondents 3 and 4 - Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board Pritinker Diwaker, J.
06/01/2016
1. In veiw of the returns filed by the respondents, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh in case ocassion so arises.
2. Cosequently, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
3. Security amount be refunded.
Sd/- Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Judge Aadil