← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhSA/56/2009dismissed

Uttam And Another v. Biselal And Others

2020-03-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Second Appeal No.56 of 2009

1. Uttam, son of Sanwal, aged 17 years, minor through his mother Jana Bai, widow of Sanwal Marar, resident of Village Baroda-Khurd, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (CG)

2. Jana Bai, widow of Late Sanwal Marar, aged 42 years, resident of Village Baroda-Khurd, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (cG) ---- Appellants/Plaintiffs

Versus

1. Biselal, son of Mohar Singh, aged about 50 years, Occupation - Agriculturist, Resident of Village Baroda-Khurd, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (CG)

2. Bisal, son of Mohar Singh, aged about 48 years, Occupation - Agriculturist, Resident of Village Daihandeah, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (CG)

3. Kushal, son of Mohar Singh, aged 46 years,

4. Kanshi, Son of Mohar Singh, aged about 44 years,

5. Kanshu, S/o Mohar Singh, Aged about 42 years,

6. Bisan, S/o Mohar Sigh, aged about 40 years,

7. Kushan Singh, S/o Mohar Singh, aged about 38 years,

8. Samunda Bai, widow of Mohar Singh, aged about 62 years, Respondent No.3 to 8 are resident of village Daihandeah, Tah. Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (CG)

9. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the District Collector, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (CG) ---- Respondents For Appellants :

None present For Respondent No.9 :

Mr.Ravi Bhagat, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

12/3/2020

1. On 5.3.2020 when the case was called out in two rounds, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. Today also, when the passed over case is called out for hearing second time, none appeared on behalf of the appellants to prosecute the appeal.

2. In view of above, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-