← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2474/2021disposed off

Bhukhan Lal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 2474 of 2021

1. Bhukhan Lal S/o Shri Dadul Pal Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Mandla, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

2. Mansukha @ Rampyaari S/o Jhagru Lodhi Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Mandla, Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

3. Dinu S/o Ghasiya Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Mandla, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Engineer In Chief Water Resources Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Executive Engineer Water Resources Department Durg, Tandula Water Resources, Division Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Officer Tandula Water Resources, Sub Division Amdabad, Balod, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Pramod Ramteke , Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 17.06.2021

1. The relief sought for by the petitioners in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider their case for regularization.

2. According to the petitioners, the respondents may be directed to consider their case in accordance with the circular dated 05.03.2008 issued by the State Govt. in this regard.

3. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, particularly

taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are still working as daily wage employees and that they have put in service for a considerable period of time, let the respondents consider the case of the petitioners for regularization in accordance with the circulars of the State Govt. particularly circular dated 05.03.2008 and any subsequent circular.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of expecting the respondents to decide the case of the petitioners, after due verification of the individual case, at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- 1.

P. Sam Koshy Judge Jyotijha