High Court Of ChhattisgarhREVP/94/2019allowed

Rajnish Shrivastva v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 94 of 2019 Rajnish Shrivastva S/o Shri P. N. Shrivastava Aged About 38 Years Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Khairbankala, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya P. S. Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. CJK Rao, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/06/2019

1. The present review petition has been filed seeking review of the order dated 08.02.2019 passed in WPS No. 851/2019.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner infact had originally filed the writ petition seeking for arrears of the benefit of revised pay scale that he had got in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) on 28.11.2017.

which has been implemented in the case of the petitioner prospectively and retrospective benefits has not been granted. However, inadvertently the order which has been passed seems to have been not connecting to the facts of the present case but is an order passed in some other case. Hence, the relief for review of the same has been sought.

3. On due considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, taking into consideration the relief sought for in the original writ petition i.e. WPS No. 851/2019 filed by the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the order dated 08.02.2019 is liable to be recalled and accordingly the review petition stands allowed,the order dated 08.02.2019 stands recalled and WP(S) 851/19 be listed for rehearing.

4. Let WPS No. 851/2019 be listed for hearing today itself in the second half.

5. The review petition accordingly stands allowed and disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit