Vijay Menan v. State Of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2728 of 2020 • Vijay Menan, S/o. Late Shri Balkrishna Menan, Aged About 33 Years R/o Quarter No. 1/17, Housing board Colony, Bhilai Industrial Area, Police Station Jamul, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., ---- Respondent For Applicant : Shri S.A.Ansari, Advocate For Respondent /State : Shri Sameer Sharma,Dy.GA Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 18/06/2020 The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 283/2018 registered at police station Bhilai, district Durg (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 294,323,365,392 and 506(B) IPC.
As per prosecution case, report was lodged by the complainant alleging that he was detained by his friend in a room and thereafter the applicant came and looted Rs. 5,000/- and his ATM card by threatening him on the point of knife.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 26.09.2018; offence is triable by Magistrate and looking to the
conduct of the prosecution it is clear that the trial will take time for its conclusion.
On the other hand counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
Having heard counsel for the parties, considered the totality of the fact, in particular the detention period of the applicant, I am inclined to release him on regular bail. Accordingly, his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed. It is directed that in the event of the applicant's furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, he shall be released on bail.
It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnishing in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.03.2020 in the matter of In Re: Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 1/2020), he need nod furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if he has not furnished the bail bonds earlier, then he will be required to furnish bail bonds within four weeks' from today. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge suguna