Vinod Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6475 of 2017
1. Vinod Kumar Sahu S/o Late Shri Sukhru Sahu, Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Sub Inspector, District Sukma Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Shishupal Sinha, S/o Shri Siyaram Sinha Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Sub Inspector, District Sukma Chhattisgarh, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh
3. Madan Mohan Ojha, S/o Subh Narayan Ojha, Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As A. P. C. S. T. F. Baghera Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
4. Kichhe Nande, S/o Bhisma Aged About 36 Years Presently Working As Head Constable No. 358, District Sukma Chhattisgarh, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh
5. Dilip Kumar Nag, S/o Late Shri Kakshman Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Head Constable In 14th Battalion C. A. F. C. F. Company Dhanova District Balod Chhattisgarh , District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home Police , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Director General Of Police Naxal Operation , Police Headquarters Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Inspector General Of Police, Bastar Range, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
5. Deputy Inspector General Of Police, S. I. B. Naxal Operation , Police Headquarters Raipur, Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
6. Superintendent Of Police, Sukma, District Sukma Chhattisgarh., District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate For State :
Mr. Majid Ali, GA -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 16/01/2018 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if grievance is not redressed. 2.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit