Hukum Singh Gaikwad v. State Of Govt. Chhattisgarh And ORS.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.713 of 2012 • Hukum Singh Gaikwad S/o Lt. Shri Govind Ram Retired Head Mater Doundi Lohara R/o Sambalpur Dist. Durg Cg ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Govt. Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG)
2. Sadasya Sachiva Pension Nirakaran Samiti, State Of Cg, General Administration Deptt Dks Bhawan Raipur Cg
3. The Accountant General State Of Cg Phapha Deeh Raipur Cg
4. The Block Education Officer Distt. Durg Cg ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State :
Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL For Respondent No.2 :
Shri Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 19/07/2017 Heard.
2.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the alleged improper deduction from the GPF account by way of certain withdrawals, which the petitioner does not accept and disputes.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Accountant General submits that the GPF payments have been made to the petitioner on the basis of the entries with regard to the part withdrawals made by the petitioner from time to time. He submits that these entries have been forwarded to the Office of the Accountant General from the petitioner's employer and therefore, it cannot be disputed. 4.
The petitioner is raising factual dispute with regard to withdrawal entries. This involves factual enquiry. Considering that the petitioner is a retired employee, all that
can be done is to direct the respondents to re-verify the entries. The petitioner shall submit a list of disputed entries separately in the office of Accountant General by way of an affidavit. The disputed entries shall be verified by seeking information from the department of the petitioner. The department shall do well to obtain necessary information regarding disputed entries from the disbursing officer concerned. If after this exercise, if any amount is found due and payable to the petitioner, the same should be paid to the petitioner as early as possible preferably within a period of six months.
SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane