High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/703/2017dismissed

Asharam Sonwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-02-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 703 of 2017 Asharam Sonwani S/o Shri Shatruram Sonwani, Aged About 39 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher ( Panchayat) At Government Primary School, Budni, P.S. Kharora Tilda, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Magarlod, Distt. Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Additional Chief Executive Officer ( Education)/ Block Education Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Magarlod, Distt. Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Headmaster, Government Primary School, Budeni, P.S. Kharora, Tilda, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For petitioner - Ms. Meha Kumar, Advocate.

For Respondent/State -Shri Dilman Rati Minj, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 10/02/2017 1.

Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15/10/2015, 20/10/2015 and 18/11/2015 issued by the Collector Dhamtari, Additional Chief Executive Officer, Magarlod and District Education Officer, Dhamtari whereby it is alleged that under the garb of rationalisation process, the petitioner who is Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) was transferred from Dhamtari to Raipur. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the similar like nature of petition the High Court by an order dated 23/12/2016 in bunch of petitions have quashed the like nature of order,

therefore petitioner in this case want to withdraw the instant petition to make representation before the appropriate authority so that similar like nature of orders may be passed.

Learned State counsel do not dispute the same. 4.

Considering the fact as has been submitted like nature of cases have already been disposed of wherein law has been laid down by this court, petitioner is given liberty.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to make representation within a period of one month from today. Respective authority shall decide the same within further period of two months.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri