Padma Choubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4027 of 2015 Padma Choubey W/o Shri Shailesh Choubey, Aged About 41 Years Presently Posted As Teacher (Panchayat) At Government Girls Middle School Mopka, Bilha District Bilaspur, R/o Bangali Para, Naya Sarkanda P S Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

4. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

5. The Block Education Officer, Bilha, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

6. Mira Tiwari, Presently Posted As Teacher (Panchayat) At Government Girls Middle School Mopka, Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

7. Durga Sarkar, Posted As Upper Division Teacher At Government Girls Middle School Mopka, Bilha District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

8. Pratima Bole, Posted As Upper Division Teacher At Government Girls Middle School Mopka, Bilha District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Matin Siddique, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Varun Sharma, Panel Lawyer No.1, 2, 4 and 5 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 06/11/2015 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent No.5/Block Education Officer, Bilha declared the petitioner

surplus and she has been transferred from Government Middle Girls School, Mopka to Government Middle School, Pharhada by the respondent No.4/District Education Officer, Bilaspur, however, juniors of the petitioner i.e. respondents No.6 to 8 have been retained at Government Middle Girls School, Mopka. He would further submit that the petitioner will permit to make a representation highlighting and pointing out the illegality in the order of transfer before the respondent No.2.

2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation raising her all grievances before the respondent No.2 and in turn, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner on its own merit and in accordance with law within a period of one month.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-