← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1048/2017disposed off

Seema Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1048 of 2017 Seema Yadav W/o Late Santosh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 35 Years R/o Padaw Para, Near Santoshi Mandir, Kota, Tahsil Kota, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Collector, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

3. District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

5. Block Education Officer, Block Podi Uproda, Tehsil Pali, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Rohit Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt .Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 02/03/2017

1. The petitioner by way of this petition seeks a direction to the respondents to consider her case for grant of compassionate appointment.

2. The claim of the petitioner is that, her Husband while working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III died in harness on 15.11.2012. According to petitioner, she moved an application for compassionate appointment in the year, 2013, but the same was turned down on the ground that she does not possess the minimum requisite qualification for the appointment on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. Subsequently, the petitioner is said to have made a representation to the extent that in case if the petitioner does not have the requisite qualification for being considered as Shiksha

Karmi, her case may at least be considered for compassionate appointment as a Class IV employee like Peon etc.. The said application is pending and till date no decision has been taken on the said application by the respondent No.4.

3. At this juncture, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4 to decide the claim of the petitioner wherein she has stated that her case may be considered even against a Class-IV post like Peon etc. Let this exercise be done by the respondent No.4 within a period of 60 days from the date of the certified copy of the order being placed before the respondent No.4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to produce the certified copy of this order along with a fresh claim application mentioning the earlier claim made by her within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P.Sam Koshy) Judge inder