High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1112/2017disposed off

Shailendra Kumar Meshram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1112 of 2017 Shailendra Kumar Meshram S/o Babulal Meshram, Aged About 61 Years Working As Senior Mandi Secretary And Posted At Office Of Joint Director, Chhattisgarh Krishi Vipran Mandi Board Divisional Office, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh), R/o Mamta Nagar, Street No.6, Ward No. 17, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agricultural, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Managing Director, Agriculture Marketing Mandi Board, Beej Bhawan, Telibandha Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Shri B Gopa Kumar, Deputy AG.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 07/03/2017

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that, he being senior most Mandi Secretary was eligible for promotion to the next higher post of Secretary, Selection Grade. According to the petitioner, his juniors have already been granted promotion but for some reasons promotion has not been granted to the petitioner. He further submits that he has been orally informed by the superior authorities that some of the confidential reports of the petitioner is not traceable and therefore his case could not be considered.

2. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case ends of justice would meet if the case of the petitioner is scrutinized by the respondent No.2Managing Director, Agriculture, Marketing Mandi Board, and after due verification of the facts and also after making all efforts for obtaining the missing CR's of the petitioner, shall take a decision on the petitioner's claim for

promotion at bar with the juniors within a period of 90 days from the date of petitioner's providing certified copy of this order to the respondent No.2.

3. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder