High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1973/2015disposed off

Anil Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-11-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1973 of 2015

1. Anil Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Pannalal Sahu, Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No. 8, C/o Church, Mouharpara, Manendragarh, Tahsil & Police Station Manendragarh, Civil & Revenue District Korea Chhattisgarh

2. Deepakchandra Binkar, S/o Jaimangal, Aged About 49 Years R/o Ward No. 3, C/o Chruch, Mauharpara, Manendragarh, Tahsil & Police Station Manendragarh, Civil & Revenue District Korea Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Government Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer, Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer, Block Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh

6. Assistant Block Education Officer, Block Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri AS Rajput, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 05/11/2015

1. Petitioners are challenging the order dated 15-6-2015 (Annexure P-6) passed by the respondents, whereby the Government Girls Middle School, Manendragarh (TWD) has been merged in Government Girls Middle School, Manendragarh (Education Department), district Korea under the rationalization policy.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that he is not pressing the writ petition and wants to withdraw the same with liberty to move representation, which is not opposed by learned State counsel.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to move representation, however, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities would be at liberty to consider and decide the representation, on its own merits, in accordance with law.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu