Smt Gayatri Devi And Another v. Kumud Devi And Others
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR SA No.321 of 2008
1. Smt. Gayatri Devi widow of Late Sukhdev Gond, aged about 60 years, Occupation Agriculturist, Resident of Village Hardi, Tahsil Doundilohara, District Durg (CG)
2. Smt. Meena Bai Wife of Venkat Gond, D/o Late Sukhdev Gond, aged about 48 years, Resident of Village Katenga, Tahsil Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG) Presently residing at Village Hardi, Tahsil Doundilohara, District Durg (CG) (The appellants are Legal Heirs of the deceased Sukhdev Gond (defendant No.1) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. Kumud Devi, aged about 45 years, D/o Munnalal, Agriculturist, Resident of Village Hardi, P.H. No.4, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG), Presently residing at Village Janjgiri, Tahsil and District Durg (CG)
2. Rewti Devi, aged about 42 years, D/o Munnalal, Agriculturist, Resident of Village Hardi, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG), Presently residing at Village Puldi, Tahsil Harda, District Hoshangabad
3. Brij Bai Widow of Late Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh, aged about 53 years, Agriculturist, Resident of Village Haldi, Tahsil Doundilohara, District Durg (CG)
4. Devendra Kumar Son of Late Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh, aged about 53 years, Agriculturist, Resident of Village Haldi, Tahsil Doundilohara, District Durg (CG)
5. Vimal Kumar Son of Late Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh, aged about 33 years, Resident of Village Haldi, Tahsil Doundilohara, District Durg (CG)
6. Karuna Bai D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh, W/o Ashwani Kumar Deshmukh, aged about 45 years, Resident of Village Bharar, Tahsil and Police Station Patan, District Durg (CG)
7. Kiran Bai D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh, W/o Mithilesh Deshmukh, aged about 40 years, Resident of Village Sundra, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG)
8. Kamna Bai W/o Late Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh, W/o Dr. Rupesh Deshmukh, aged about 30 years, Resident of Pandepara, Balod, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG) (The respondent No.3 to 8 are Legal Heirs of the deceased Chandrika Prasad Deshmukh) Respondents For Petitioners :
None present For Respondents No.3 to 8: Ms Sofia Khan, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board 26.11.2018
1. When the passed over case is called out for hearing second time, none present for the appellants. No representation is made.
2. In view of above, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-