High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1346/2017disposed off

Panchram Marbel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1346 of 2017 • Panchram Marbel S/o Rajbahadur Marbel, Aged About 64 Years Retired Headmaster, Govt. Primary School, Barpali, Block Akaltara, District JanjgirChampa, (Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Devri, Post Katnai, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. District Eduction Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Director, Treasury And Account, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer, Akaltara, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri KS Pawar and Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha Advocates.

For Respondent/State :

Shri SP Kale, Deputy Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 21/03/2017

1. The limited prayer which the Petitioner has sought in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide his representation dated 08.01.2016 which he has made to respondent No.2 against the dispute pertaining to the leave encashment applicable to the petitioner.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that in his credit according to him, there is a leave credit of 275 days, however, as per the respondent, leave in his credit is only 77 days. He further submits that he has made detailed representation to the respondent No.2 showing that there are sufficient leave in his credit and he is entitled for entire encashment of 240 days.

3. In view of fact that the petitioner's representation is still pending, this court is of the opinion that let the respondent No.2 personally get the service records of the petitioner verified particularly in respect of his leave account so as to determine what would be the number of days which he would be entitled for encashment.

4. Let the respondent No.2 take a decision on the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2016 (Annexure P/6) within a period of 90 days from today and the petitioner be suitably intimated in this regard.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (P.Sam Koshy) Judge inder