Sandeep Kumar Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2951 of 2018
1. Sandeep Kumar Verma S/o Shiv Kumar Verma Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. High School, Telasi, Block Palari, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh
2. Dharmendra Verma S/o Tularam Verma Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. High School, Telasi, Block Palari, DistrictBaloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh
3. Dinesh Kumar Sahu S/o Khamhan Lal Sahu Aged About 34 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. High School, Telasi, Block Palari, DistrictBaloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh
4. Smt. Buddheswari Verma W/o Dharmendra Kumar Verma Aged About 38 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) At Govt. Middle School, Khartora, Block Palari, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
5. Ku. Rekha Verma D/o Shiv Kumar Verma Aged About 30 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Watgan, Block Palari, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
6. Amit Kumar Bharti S/o Ramtahal Bharti Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Lahod, Block Baloda Bazar, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, DistrictBaloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents Shri Govind Dewangan, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 11/04/2018 Heard.
1.
Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.
2.
In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and the action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with a direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.
3.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti