← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3044/2021disposed off

Pramod Kumar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-07-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3044 of 2021 Pramod Kishor Yadav S/o Haribishun Yadav, Aged About 45 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Mitgai, Block Ramchandarpur, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Managing Director, State Project Office Holistic Education, 2nd Floor Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector/ District Mission Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Siksha Mission Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

4. The District Education Officer, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Education Officer, Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

6. Block Resource Coordinator, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

7. Principal, Govt. High School Mitgai, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

8. Chandradeep Yadav Presently Working On The Post Of Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Posted At Govt. Primary School Semarkhand, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Amit Buxy, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 27.07.2021

1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall remove the minor default as pointed out by the Registry.

2. Let the petitioner cure the default during the course of the day itself. With the consent of the parties, the matter was heard finally at admission stage.

3. The petitioner seems to be aggrieved of the decision on the part of the respondents in appointing respondent no.8 as the Circle Coordinator (Cluster Academic Coordinator) for Circle Mitgai, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj.

4. The main contention of the petitioner is that the respondent no.8 is not competent and eligible to be appointed as a Circle Coordinator as he is working as an Assistant Teacher and the petitioner who is working as a Teacher is fully eligible for being appointed as a Circle Coordinator.

5. Given the aforesaid limited grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation/objection before the respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 in turn shall take an appropriate decision on the same in accordance with the rules, regulations and the guidelines governing the field after due hearing being granted to the respondent no.8, at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of submission of the fresh representation by the petitioner.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent no.3 shall take a decision

strictly in accordance with the guidelines governing the field.

7. With the said observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai