High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/85/2016allowed

Mukesh Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-02-26Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.C.C No. 85 of 2016

1. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Balram Sahu, Aged About 44 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat) Government Higher Secondary School, Tangapani, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

2. Naresh Chandra Som S/o Shri Domar Singh Som, Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat), Government Higher Secondary School, Belrgaon, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

3. Mannu Lal S/o Shri Sadaram Sahu, Aged About 66 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat), Government Higher Secondary School, Ghutkel, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

4. Premlal Sahu S/o Shri Shivram Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat), Government Higher Secondary School, Sankara, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Department Of Finance, Through Its Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Directorate Of Panchayat, Through The Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, Through The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, Zila Panchayat Office, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

5. Khijan Lal Sahu, S/o Ramnath Sahu, aged about 42 years, presently posted as Lecturer (Panchayat), Government High School, Devpur, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Appellants:

Shri Abhuday Singh, Advocate.

For Respondents/State:

Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Deputy Advocate General.

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Judgment on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 26/02/2016 1.

The present application has been filed for restoration of Writ Appeal No.344/2015 dismissed on 9.12.2015 for non-prosecution. 2.

Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties, for reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and Writ Appeal No.344/2015 is restored to file for disposal on merits.

Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Priya