← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/143/2016dismissed

Ram Suhavan Loniya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-01-15Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 143 OF 2016 1.

Ram Suhavan Loniya, S/o Shri Ramsanehi Loniya, aged about 32 years, R/o Gram Navrangpur, Post Ramhepur, Thana & Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) 2.

Vikash Kumar Loniya, S/o Shri Khemraj Loniya, aged about 26 years, R/o Gram Navrangpur, Post Ramhepur, Thana & Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) 3.

Nohar Singh Rawat, S/o Shri Chaitram Rawat, aged about 29 years, R/o Gram Lapti, Post Nawadih, Thana & Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

State of Chhatisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur (C.G.) 3.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kota District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Gorela District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pendra District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Marwahi District Bilaspur (C.G.) 10.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Lormi District Mungeli (C.G.) 11.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pathria District Mungeli (C.G.) 12.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Mr. Prafull Bharat, Additional Advocate General.

-2Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board Per NAVIN SINHA, C.J.

15/01/2016 1.

In view of the law that laying down qualification for appointment is the privilege and prerogative of the employer, after some arguments, leave is sought to withdraw the petition for representing before the authorities.

2.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ Chief Justice Judge