High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/236/2016dismissed

Battu Lal Bareth v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 236 of 2016

1. Battu Lal Bareth S/o Shri Sone Sai Aged About 69 Years

2. Chhattu Lal, S/o Sone Sai Aged About 58 Years

3. Rath Ram, S/o Sone Sai Aged About 48 Years All R/o Marwa Tendu Bhata, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa, Tahsil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Rehabilitation, Mantralaya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Superintending Engineer, C.S.P.G.C.L. ( C.S.P.D.C.L.) Power Project Marwa Tendu Bhatha, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Engineer, C.S.P.G.C.L. ( C.S.P.D.C.L.), Korba Chhattisgarh

4. Superintending Engineer, C.S.P.G.C.L. ( C.S.P.D.C.L.), Korba Chhattisgarh

5. Collector, District Janjgir Champa, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Sub Divisional Officer ( Revenue ), Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

7. Tahsildar, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Yogeshwar Sharma, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 5 to 7 :

Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondents No. 2 & 4 :

Ms. Veena Nair, Advocate S.B. :

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 29/01/2016

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be

-2satisfied if a direction in terms of order dated 22.1.2016 passed by this Court in WPC No.164 of 2016 (batch of petitions) is issued in the case of the petitioners also.

2. Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents.

3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to move necessary application before the competent authority for release of the amount of compensation and/or enhancement of the amount of compensation as also to seek benefit of rehabilitation policy of the Government.

4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioners' applications are not decided, it will remain open for them to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to them under the law. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen