Ntpc Limited v. Poshan Lal Dewangan

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 78 of 2016

1. NTPC Limited Lara Super Thermal Power Project, Through Its General Manager, Presently Project Office At Chhapora, At Post Chhapora, Pussore, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

[note:- In The Impugned Order, The Appellant No. 1 Has Been Impleaded As :- General Manager, NTPC Limited, Lara Super Thermal Power Project, Office Address Opposite Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank / SBI, Kotra Road, Raigarh, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).]

2. Deputy General Manager (Vigilance), N T P C Limited, Korba, Revenue & Civil District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

---- Appellants

Versus

1. Poshan Lal Dewangan S/o Shriram Dewangan, aged about 59 years.

2. Smt. Kumari Bai W/o Poshan Lal Dewangan, aged about 54 years.

3. Ku. Madhu Dewangan, D/o Poshan Lal Dewangan, aged about 30 years.

4. Ku. Kalpana Dewangan, D/o Poshan Lal Dewangan, aged about 30 years.

5. Ku. Dipika Dewangan, D/o Poshan Lal Dewangan, aged about 26 years. All are R/o B-960 (Earlier 950) Kaveri Vihar, NTPC Township, Post Jamnipali, Tahsil Katghora, PS Darri, Revenue & Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

6. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Industries/ Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Revenue & Civil District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

7. Collector, Raigarh, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

8. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)- Cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Raigarh, Tahsil Raigarh, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Appellants :

Dr. N.K.Shukla, Senior Advocate with Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate.

For Respondents 1&2 :

Shri Surfaraz Khan, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Prafull N Bharat, Additional Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.

Order on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 18/02/2016 1.

The present appeal arises from a common order dated 17.12.2015 in Writ Petition (C) No. 887 of 2015 and analogous petitions including Writ Petition (C) No. 888 of 2015.

2.

Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that this appeal may also be disposed in terms of order dated 4.2.2016 in Writ Appeal No. 47 of 2016 and analogous appeals.

3.

It is ordered accordingly.

4.

The only modification is with regard to the prescription of time limit as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the order dated 4.2.2016 to be reckoned in accordance with the present order.

5.

The writ appeal stands disposed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Anu