N T P C Limited v. Sylvester Lakra

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 52 of 2016

1. NTPC Limited Lara Super Thermal Power Project, Through Its General Manager, Presently Project Office At Chhapora, At Post Chhapora, Pussore, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

[note:- In The Impugned Order, The Appellant No. 1 Has Been Impleaded As :- General Manager, N T P C Limited, Lara Super Thermal Power Project, Office Address Opposite Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank / SBI, Kotra Road, Raigarh, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).]

2. Deputy General Manager ( Vigilance), N T P C Limited, Korba, Revenue & Civil District Korba (Chhattisgarh).

---- Appellants

Versus

1. Sylvester Lakra S/o Samuel Lakra, aged about 55 years.

2. Smt. Nirmala Lakra, W/o Sylvester Lakra, aged about 54 years. Both are R/o AB-1428 & 1430 (Earlier No. A-1430) Kaveri Vihar, NTPC Township Post Jamnipali, PS Darri, Tahsil Katghora, Revenue and Civil District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Industries/ Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Revenue & Civil District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

4. Collector, Raigarh, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

5. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)- Cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Raigarh, Tahsil Raigarh, Revenue & Civil District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Appellant :

Dr. N.K.Shukla, Senior Advocate with Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate.

For Respondents 1&2 :

Shri Surfaraz Khan, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Prafull N Bharat, Additional Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.

Judgment on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 11/02/2016 1.

The present appeal arises from a common order dated 17.12.2015 in Writ Petition (C) No. 887 of 2015 and analogous petitions including Writ Petition (C) No. 925 of 2015.

2.

Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that this appeal may also be disposed in terms of order dated 4.2.2016 in Writ Appeal No. 47 of 2016 and analogous appeals.

3.

It is ordered accordingly.

4.

The only modification is with regard to the prescription of time limit as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the order dated 4.2.2016 to be reckoned in accordance with the present order.

5.

The writ appeal stands disposed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Subbu