← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1028/2018disposed off

Trishala Swa Sahayata Samuh, v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1028 of 2018 Trishala Swa Sahayata Samuh Kohraud Development Block Masturi, District Bilaspur through its President, Smt. Pushpa Vimal W/o Cahbisen Vimal, aged about 43 years, R/o Village Kohraud, Thana and Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Collector, Collectorate, Bilaspur, Thana and District Bilaspur (C.G.)

4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Collectorate Compound, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. N. K. Malviya, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 12/04/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, the petitioner is entitled to continue for the period of five years and then only the circular dated 05.06.2017 would apply but on the other hand, by notice /

order dated 05.01.2018, District Programme Officer has terminated the contract without any rhyme and reason.

2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the District Programme Officer within a period of seven days from today bringing to his notice Clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, which will be considered and decided within a further period of seven days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka