Lakhanlal Kaushal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 960 of 2018 Lakhanlal Kaushal W/o Modhoram Kaushal, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Geedam, Tahsil Geedam, South Bastar, Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh., District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, South Bastar Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), South Bastar Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

4. Tahsildar, Geedam, South Bastar, Dantewada District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

5. Sub - Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Geedam South Bastar Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

6. Nagar Panchayat Geedam, Through its Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Geedam, South Bastar, Dantewada District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate.

For Respondents/ State :

Mr. D. R. Minj, Dy. G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/04/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that impugned notice dated 24.01.2018 has been issued to the petitioner by the Tahsildar, Geedam for dispossessing the petitioner from his land whereas neither the land has been acquired nor any compensation has been paid to the petitioner.

2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the Tahsildar, Geedam for redressal of his grievance who, in turn, shall consider and dispose of the petitioner's application expeditiously within a period of four weeks from today before taking any action on the letter / notice dated 24.01.2018.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka