← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/2866/2021allowed

Lakeshwar Prasad Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-06-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

M.Cr.C. No. 2866 of 2021 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 2866 of 2021 • Lakeshwar Prasad Patel S/o Late Genda Patel, aged about 51 years, R/o Village- Kedar, Police Station and Tahsil - Sarangarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh, Through : S.H.O. of the Police Station - Kedar, Tahsil Sarangarh, and District - Raigarh (C.G.) ---- State/Non-Applicant For Applicant :

Shri Abhishek Saraf, Advocate For Non-Applicant/State :

Shri Anand Verma, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya, J Order on Board 07.06.2021

1. The application is heard through Video Conferencing.

2. Admit.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

4. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as he is in jail since 28.03.2021 in connection with Crime No. 28/2021 registered in Police Station- Kedar, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 34 (2) & 59 (A) of the CG Excise Act.

5. Allegation against the present applicant is that he was found in illegal possession of 10.00 bulk liters of hand made mahuwa liquor.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this crime, he is languishing in jail since 28.03.2021 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time. Therefore, the applicant be released on bail.

7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

M.Cr.C. No. 2866 of 2021

8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the quantity of illicit liquor, detention period of the applicant who is 51 years old, conclusion of the trial is likely to take some, only two criminal antecedents against the applicant as admitted by both the counsel and there is no apprehension of the applicant tampering with the evidence or absconding, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

9. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- i.

he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such fact to the Court. ii. he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and iii. he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. iv. he shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature in future or else this order granting bail to the applicant shall automatically stand cancelled without further reference to the Bench.

Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge vatti