← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1042/2016disposed off

Ishwari Prasad Sarthi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-04-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1042 of 2016 Ishwari Prasad Sarthi, son of Shri Patang Ram Sarthi, aged about 45 years, R/o Village and post Jatri, Tahsil Pussore, District Raigarh (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 2.

Joint Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

3.

Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Malhar, District Bilaspur (CG).

4.

Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Geedam, District Dantewada (CG).

--- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/04/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a victim of frequent transfer. He further submits that on 19.08.2015, he has been transferred from Nagar Panchayat Gourela to Nagar Panchayat Malhar and again on 01.04.2016, he has been transferred from Nagar Panchayat Malhar to Nagar Panchayat

Geedam within eight months and therefore he may be permitted to make a representation before the State Government for redressal of his grievances within ten days from today.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to make a representation before the State Government. If such representation is made by the petitioner before the State Government within ten days from today, the State Government shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with copy of this order. (5) For a period of five weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner with regard to the subject matter. (6) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-