High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1139/2016withdrawn

Harikishan Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-04-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. 1139 OF 2016

1. Harikishan Sahu S/o Shri Dhansingh Sahu, Aged About 47 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School, Musrakhurd, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Mahendra Kumar Gajendra, S/o Shri Gulab Ram Gajendra, Aged About 42 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School, Kurubhat, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Sukhau Ram Lautre, S/o Shri Chaitram Lautare, Aged About 41 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School, Jatkanhar, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. District Education Officer, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer , Janpad Panchayat, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgoan, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Kunwar Lal Markare, Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. H.S.S. School Lalbahadur Nagar, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Shatrughan, S/o Heera Lal Verma, Teacher ( Panchayat), Govt. Middle School, Medha, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

7. Bhojraj Dhruv, Teacher ( Panchayat) Govt. High School, Devkatta, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)

8. Neelkanth Khutel, Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. H.S.S. School Mohara, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh) ---Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. U.R. Kaushley, Advocate For State : Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 18/04/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file duly constituted petition in accordance with law.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Tiwari