Ranjana Kushwaha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.

( S ) No.

of 2016 Ranjana Kushwaha, W/o Late Shri Aditaya Kushwaha, aged about 64 years, Retired Subedar (M), R/o Care of Revindra Singh Thakur, Kududand Chandani Chowk P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P. S. and Post Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P. S. Civil Line, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Inspector General Of Police, Bilaspur P.S. Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Joint Director of Division (Funds Account and Pension), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

5. The Secretary, Finance Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

7. The Director ( Treasury, Audit And Accounts ) Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

8. The Superintendent of Police Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Badruddin Khan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board /0 4 /2016 Heard.

(1) At the outset, learned counsel for the parties would fairly submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by this Court in WP(S) No.6698/2014 {Rammani Tripathi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others} on 24.12.2014, filed as Annexure-P/4 and the present writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms. (2) Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in WP(S) No.6698/2014. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondents would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-