High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1351/2016disposed off

Ajay Kumar Pradhan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-05-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (S) No.

of 201 Ajay Kumar Pradhan, S/o Shri Bimbadhar, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School, Manki, Gram Panchayat Toshgaon, District Mahasamund, resident of Mohka, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Janpad Panchayat, Mahasamund through its Chief Executive Officer, Mahasamund (C.G.)

3. The Collector, District Mahasamund (C.G.)

4. Block Education Officer, Saraypali, District Mahasamund (C.G.)

5. The Principal, Govt. Primary School, Manki, Gram Panchayat Toshgaon, District Mahasamund (C.G.)

6. Smt. Kalpana Pradhan, Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School, Manki, Gram Panchayat Toshgaon, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. Shivang Dubey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State: Mr. S.P. Kale, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 0 6 /0 5 /201 Heard.

(1) By way of this petition, the petitioner challenged his transfer

order dated 22.03.2016 passed by respondent No. 4, by which he has been transferred from Govt. Primary School, Ghatkachhar to Govt. Primary School, Manki.

(2) Earlier, the petitioner has filed writ petition being W.P. (S) No. 5983/2014, in which this Court, by order dated 18.11.2014, has directed the respondent No. 3-Collector to decide the petitioner's representation. The petitioner's representation was rejected by the Collector, Mahasamund by order dated 16.12.2014, which has attained finality as the same has not been challenged by the petitioner.

(3) By the impugned order dated 22.03.2016, the petitioner has been directed to work at Govt. Primary School, Ghatkachhar as the petitioner was temporarily working at Govt. Primary School, Manki.

(4) In view of the aforesaid discussion, I do not find any illegality or perversity in the order impugned warranting interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

(5) Accordingly, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-