Horilal Painkra v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.3343 of 2017
1. Horilal Painkra S/o S/o Jugut Ram Aged About 46 Years Working As Assistant Teacher, Primary School Balaghar, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Subedan Tirkey S/o Adikunwar Tirkey, Aged About 52 Years Working As Assistant Teacher , Primary School Pandaripani, Block Patthalgaon,district- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Premdan Beck S/o Mohan Beck Aged About 57 Years Working As Assistant Teacher , Primary School Pandaripani, Block Patthalgaon,district- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Smt. Maya Sahu W/o Kedarnath Sahu, Aged About 57 Years Working As Assistant Teacher , Primary School Pandaripani, Block Patthalgaon,district- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Murlidahr Khuntiya S/o Bhuneshwar Ram Khuntiya, Aged About 50 Years Working As Assistant Teacher , Primary School Koylarbhadra, Block Patthalgaon,district- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
6. Bedram Painkra S/o Budiram Painkra, Aged About 52 Years Working As Assistant Teacher , Primary School Koylarbhadra, Block Patthalgaon,district- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
7. Balram Sai Painkra S/o Asnu Ram Painkra, Aged About 53 Years Working As Head Master , Primary School Chandragarh, Block Patthalgaon,district- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. The Collector Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
4. District Education Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Assistant Commissioner, Jashpur ( Tribal Development Collectorate Campus), Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
6. Block Education Officer, Block Pathhalgaon ,district Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioners :
Shri KP Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State :
Shri Manish Nigam, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 01/09/2017 The petitioners by way of this petition seek a direction to the respondents to consider their case for grant of "Time Bound Pay Scale". 2.
The grievance of the petitioners are that similarly placed person have already been granted the benefit of time bound pay scale by the respondents, but for some reasons the case of the petitioners have not been considered. It is also the contention of the petitioners that all the petitioners in this instant case are duly eligible for being considered and also fulfill all the necessary requirements under the guidelines framed by the State Government for grant of said benefit of time bound pay scale. He further submits that a direction may be issued to the respondent No.4, District Education Officer, to look into the case of the petitioners for grant of benefit of time bound pay scale as per circular of the State Government dated 22.02.2011 and which has also been extended to other similarly placed teachers vide order dated 23.11.2012. 3.
Without entering into the merits of the case, subject to petitioners fulfilling all the eligibility criteria for grant of time bound pay scale, let the respondent No.4, District Education Officer, take a decision on the claim of the petitioners for grant of benefit of time bound pay scale. The petitioners would be at liberty to file another detailed representation to the respondent No.4 in addition to the representation already filed earlier, along with all supporting documents like the circular of the State Government dated 22.02.2011 and also the order of similar relief being granted to similarly placed persons.
4.
Let this exercise be done within a period of 90 days from the date of representation and certified copy of this order along with all other relevant documents produced before the authority by the petitioners. 5.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.
SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane