Karlu Ram v. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.3049 of 2017
1. Karlu Ram S/o Chhote Gunja, Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 16 Churcha Colliery, Shivpur, Korea, District Korea Chhattisgarh
2. Ku. Salita, D/o Karlu Ram, Aged About 21 Years R/o Ward No. 16 Churcha Colliery, Shivpur, Korea District Korea Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
2. The General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh
3. Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh
4. The Personnel Manager, South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Churcha Colliery, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh
5. Sub Area Manager South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Churcha Colliery, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh
6. Chief Of Medical Services, South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri S. Majid Ali, Advocate For Respondents :
Shri Vivek Chopra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 05/10/2017 Heard.
2.
Upon instructions, learned counsel for respondents submits that in the earlier sitting of the Medical Board, case of the petitioners could not be placed,
however, as and when Medical Board next convenes, case of the petitioners would be submitted for bare assessment.
3.
In that view of the matter, at this stage, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction that the respondents shall place for consideration of petitioners cases before the next Medical Board examination. In case, the petitioner No.1 is found to be ineligible for appointment, it goes without saying that the respondents will have to proceed to provide other relief according to the relevant provisions of NCWA. All measures shall be taken to ensure that the exercise be completed as early as possible. In case, case of petitioners is not decided within a period of four months, they would be at liberty to revive the petition.
SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane