Deepak Kumar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3154 of 2021 Deepak Kumar Kaushik S/o Late Kanhaiya Lal Kaushik Aged About 39 Years R/o Jorapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
3. District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Lakhram, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Manish Upadhyay, Advocate.
For State :
Ms. Akansha Jain, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 01/07/2021
1. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in not taking a decision on the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment, the present writ petition has been filed.
2. According to the petitioner all the requisite formalities required on the part of the petitioner has already been done and the concerned Principal has also forwarded the claim application of the petitioner to the office of respondent no.3, the District Education Officer. However, thereafter there has been no further progress made on the claim of the petitioner.
-2According to the petitioner it is a case where father of the petitioner Late Kanhaiya Lal Kaushik died in harness on 26.07.2012 and till date the respondents have not finalized the claim of the petitioner and in the process the petitioners are facing great hardship in sustaining themselves.
3. Given the aforesaid factual backdrop, this Court is of the opinion that the writ petition at this juncture can be disposed of directing the respondent no.3 to take a decision on the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment at the earliest in accordance with the policy governing the filed preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit