Vijay Kumar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3048 of 2021 Vijay Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Muneshwar Yadav, Aged About 31 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Semarwa, Block Ramchandrapur, Tahsil Ramanujganj District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Managing Director, State Project Office Holistic Education 2nd Floor Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Pension Bada Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector / District Mission Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Siksha Mission Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

4. The District Education Officer, Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Education Officer, Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

6. Block Resource Coordinator, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

7. Principal, Govt. High School Kushphar, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

8. Shyam Kartik Gupta, Presently Working On The Post Of Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Posted At Govt. Primary School Trisuli, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board

29.06.2021

1. The petitioner seems to be aggrieved of the decision on the part of the respondents in appointing respondent no.8 as the Circle Coordinator (Cluster Academic Coordinator) for Circle, Kushphar, Block Ramchandarpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj.

2. The main contention of the petitioner is that the respondent no.8 is not posted anywhere within the said circle for being appointed as a Circle Coordinator which is otherwise the requirement of law under the rules and guidelines framed in this regard.

3. Given the aforesaid limited grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation/objection before the respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 in turn shall take an appropriate decision on the same in accordance with the rules, regulations and the guidelines governing the field after due hearing being granted to the respondent no.8, at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of submission of the fresh representation by the petitioner.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent no.3 shall take a decision strictly in accordance with the guidelines governing the field.

5. With the said observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai