High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3364/2017disposed off

Sampat Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-08-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3300 of 2017 Vipin Kumar Sahu S/o Sukhdeo Sahu Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Teacher Panchayat At Govt. Middile School, Dongridih, Block & District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Balodagbazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---Respondents And WPS No. 3364 of 2017 Sampat Kumar Sahu S/o Jugut Ram Sahu, Aged About 33 Years Presently Working As Lecturer Panchayatt At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Borshi, Block Kasdol, District Balodabazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Throug- The Secretay, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar- District Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baloda Bazar, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 16/08/2017 Heard.

1. Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent authorities to count their earlier service period from the date of initial appointment for providing benefit of pay scale in the light of State Government's order dated 23.04.2016 which has been issued pursuant to the order passed by the Division Bench in Manoj Kumar Dadsena and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others {WA No.413/2014} and other connected writ appeals on 09.12.2015.

2. Considering the fact that the respondents are yet to take decision in the matter, the writ petitions are disposed of with direction that in the event petitioners prefer fresh representation before the appointing authority/competent authority claiming benefit of circular dated 23.04.2016 within a period of one month from today, the authority shall verify the issue concerning application of the circular dated 23.04.2016 in respect of petitioners and pass necessary speaking order in this regard within further period of three months.

3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha