Smt. Kalyani Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2696 of 2019

1. Smt. Kalyani Sharma W/o Late Vyasnarayan Sharma Aged About 55 Years R/o South Vasundhara Nagar, Bhilai 3, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Neera Bai W/o Late Ramnarayan Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Urla, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Bitwan Verma W/o Late Bhuwan Lal Verma Aged About 72 Years R/o Shantipara Ward No. 8, Bhilai 3 Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Mongra Banchhor W/o Late Surendra Kumar Banchhor Aged About 66 Years R/o Shitla Para, Bhilai - 3, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Through Its Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indiravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Corporation Bhilai Charoda Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai - Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. AG

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 24/04/2019

1. This writ petition has been filed by four widows whose husband's were working under the respondent No. 3 and who died in harness serving as Contingency Paid employees.

2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that husband of all four petitioner's in fact had put in around about 10 years or more of service and according to the contingency rules and they would had been entitled for the benefit of pension. It was further contention of the petitioners that the State Government now has recently issued certain circulars where they have decided to even count the service rendered as a daily wage employee for the purpose of grant of pension.

3. Given the aforesaid factual matrix of the case, let petitioners make a suitable representation in this regard to the respondent No. 2 & 3 within a period of four weeks from today and respondent No. 2 & 3 in turn shall consider the contents of the case and decide the claim of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of representation to be made by the petitioners in accordance with the rules and regulations and the circulars issued by the State Government from time to time.

4. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit