Smt. Kamla Shukla v. Smt. Vandana Shukla

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CR No. 136 of 2013 • Smt. Kamla Shukla, W/o Lt. Shyamlal Shukla, aged about 65 years, resident of Pachpedi Naka, Tikrapara, Raipur, Civil & Revenue, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner / Defendant No.6

Versus

1. Smt. Vandana Shukla, W/o Lt. Arun Kumar Shukla, aged about 27 years, resident of - Nagdouni Colony, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, Civil and Revenue Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) (Applicant No.1)

2. Varun Kumar Shukla, S/o Lat. Arun Kumar Shukla, aged about 5 years, minor through natural guardian mother Smt. Vandana Shukla, W/o Lt. Arun Kumar Shukla, R/o Nagdouni Colony, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, Civil and Revenue Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) (Applicant No.2)

3. Superintendent, Main Post Office, Bairan Bazar, Raipur, Tah. - Raipur Civil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) (Non-Applicant No.2)

4. Superintendent, Main Post Office, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Tah. - Bilaspur Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Non-Applicant No.3.)

5. Director Postal Services, Raipur, Postal Division, Raipur, Tah. - Raipur, Civil and revenue District Raipur (C.G.) (Non-Applicant No.4)

6. Common Public, who is concerned (Non-Applicant No.5) ---- Respondents For Applicant :

None appears For Respondents :

Hon'ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja Order On Board By I.S.Uboweja 05/02/2016 Since no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the applicant even when the passed over matter is called out, therefore, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss this revision for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, this revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (I.S.Uboweja) Judge Anjani