Fagulal Ballarkhede v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2889 of 2021 Fagulal Ballarkhede S/o Late Shri Rupram Ballarkhede Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Sahaki, Post Kalimati, Tahsil Lanji, District Balaghat (M.P.). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of CoOperative Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2.

Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Chhattisgarh Block - 3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3.

Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Bank Maryadit (Apex Bank), Sahkar Bhawan, Sector 24, Plot No. 76, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Kunal Das, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 24/06/2021 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner after amalgamation of C.G. State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank and C.G. State Co-Operative Bank, rendered his services as Assistant General Manager from 07.10.2014 and eventually he retired on 31.10.2015 from the post of DGM. It is contended that after his retirement he is given pension of Rs. 8,000/- where as for the person holding the post of DGM in the Bank are entitled to pension of Rs. 12,000/- and one W.R. Hande is being paid the likewise pension of Rs. 12,000/-. The petitioner contended that he is subjected to

discrimination. At this stage the petitioner prays that he has made a representation (Annexure P-5) to Respondent No. 3 which may be decided so that the petitioner may be paid Rs. 12,000/- p.m. 2.

Considering the prayer at this stage Respondent No. 3 to whom the representation (Annexure P-5) is made, is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner with respect to payment of pension within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if the petitioner is entitled for higher pension the same may be paid to him.

3.

With the above observations, this writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved