High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/398/2021disposed off

Central Board Of Trustees v. Arun Agrawal

2021-09-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 395 of 2021 • Central Board Of Trustees, Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Block - D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavasayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh - 492004.

---- Petitioner

Versus

• Arun Agrawal, Director, M / S Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Railway Station, Station Road, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent CONT No. 396 of 2021 • Central Board Of Trustees Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Block-D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavasayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492004 ---- Petitioner

Versus

• Arun Agrawal Director, M/s Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Railway Station, Station Road, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent CONT No. 398 of 2021 • Central Board Of Trustees Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Block-D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavasayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh), 492004 ---- Petitioner

Versus

• Arun Agrawal Director, M/s Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Railway Station, Station Road, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent CONT No. 400 of 2021 • Central Board Of Trustees, Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Block - D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavasayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh - 492004.

---- Petitioner

Versus

• Arun Agrawal, Director, M/s Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Railway Station, Station Road, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent ___________________________________________________________________ For Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Pillai and Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Advocates.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 24/09/2021

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the contempt petition may not continue any further because the nonapplicant/respondent died unfortunate death due to corona.

2. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.

3. It will be open for the petitioner to file contempt petition, if any, against those who are guilty of willful disobedience of the order of this Court. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Ravi