Peelaram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 1009 of 2018 Peelaram S/o Vrindavan, aged about 68 years, R/o Village - Gugahan, Post - Garumariya, Tahsil - Pusaur, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

2. The Registrar, District Registrar Office, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

3. The Sub Registrar, District Registrar Office, Raigarh, District Raigarh, (C.G.)

4. Arpit Mehta, S/o Shri Ajit Mehta, aged about 29 years, Occupation - Business, R/o Daroga Para Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, G. A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 12/04/18 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No. 3 has denied to accept the lease deed for registration with regard to diverted land of the petitioner, aggrieved against which this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent State would submit that if the lease deed is presented in accordance with law, it will be accepted by the respondent authorities.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4.

In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the

respondent - State, this writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka