Jayant Deshmukh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR • Jayant Deshmukh S/o Late Shri I. L. Deshmukh, aged About 29 Years, Member, Zila Panchayat, Durg And Member, District Education Society, Durg Chhattisgarh. R/o LIG 265, Padmanabhpur, Durg Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary Department Of Commercial Tax, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh.

4. District Education Officer Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh.

5. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-1(1), Government Of India, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

6. Commercial Tax Officer Unit 01, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh.

7. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra 2, Community Center, Preet Vihar, Vikas Marg, Delhi - 110092.

8. Mar Gregorios Orthodox Cathedral Through The Vice President, Management of Mar Gregorios Orthodox Cathedral, Sector-6, Bhilai, District - Durg Chhattisgarh.

9. Mar Gregorios Memorial (MGM) Senior Secondary School Through The Principal, Mar Gregorios Memorial (MGM) Senior Secondary School, Sector-6, Bhilai, District - Durg Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Shri Kanak Tiwari, Advocate General along with Shri Faiz Kazi, PL For Respondent No.5 :- Ms Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate For Respondent No.7 :- Shri Tarun Dansena, Advocate on behalf of Shri T.K. Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J.

Judgment on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ 11/04/2019

1. This petition in the nature of PIL has been preferred for initiating inquiry against the respondent Nos.8 and 9 School into the allegation of commission and omission of irregularities under different enactments.

2. Learned Advocate General would submit, at the outset, that the State Authorities have instructed different Education Officers throughout the State to conduct investigation into all

such complaints where the schools have been found to commit illegalities or irregularities. Based on the report of the District Education Officer, appropriate action shall be taken against all erring schools.

3. In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate General nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition.

4. The PIL stands disposed of.

Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Acting Chief Justice Judge Ankit