← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2982/2018disposed off

Parasmanee Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2982 of 2018

1. Parasmanee Thakur S/o Shri Chhannoo Lal , Aged About 33 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat ) And Posted At Government Middle School Rengadabari, Block Daundilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

2. Prem Thakur , S/o Shri Righu Thakur Aged About 32 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government Middle School Annutola, Block Daundilohara , District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Uday Singh Koliyare S/o Shri Prem Singh Koliyare Aged About 33 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government Middle School Amalidih, Block Balod , District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

4. Manish Kumar Vaide , S/o Shri Bisahooram Vaide Aged About 31 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government Middle School Baghmara, Block Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

5. Lokeshwar Prasad S/o Shri Dhooj Ram Aged About 29 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government Middle School Bhengari, Block Balod , District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

6. Kameshwar Prasad Sinha S/o Shri Bhoj Ram Sinha Aged About 34 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government Middle School Barhi , Blockdaundilohara District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer , Zila Panchayat Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Satish Gupta, GA -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 12/04/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit