Horilal Chandne v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2978 of 2018

1. Horilal Chandne S/o Shri Nikum Lal Chandne, Aged About 37 Years Working As Teacher Panchayat, Govt. Middle School, Godiyari, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

2. Bhajan Singh Nagesh S/o Kumo Singh, Aged About 40 Years Working As Teacher Panchayat, Govt. Middle School, Panigaon, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

3. Narendra Singh Diwan S/o Bahadur Singh Diwan, Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. Middle School, Mudgelmal, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

4. Vasudev Netam S/o Kundan Netam, Aged About 30 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. High School, Birighat, Block Mainpur, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

5. Kishor Kumar Sahu, S/o Ramsai Sahu, Aged About 32 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. High School, Sonasili, Block Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :

Mr. CJK Rao, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Satish Gupta, GA -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 12/04/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit