Gyatri Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Sakrapali M. v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1073 of 2016
1. Sushila Devi Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh President Smt. Vedmati Sushila Devi Aged About 30 Years, Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh, Village Mohtara (N) Block Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Director, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Vibhag Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. District Program Officer, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Vibhag, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
4. Pariyojna Adhikari Ekikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojna Bhatgaon, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
5. Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
6. Commissioner Raipur, Division Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent And WPC No. 973 Of 2016
1. Gyatri Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Sakrapali (M) President Smt. Gwalin Bai W/o Bhujbal Yadav, Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Sakrapali (M), Village Mohtara (N) Block Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).
2. Director, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Vibhag Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. District Program Officer, Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Vibhag, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
4. Pariyojna Adhikari Ekikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojna Bhatgaon, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
5. Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
6. Commissioner Raipur, Division Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri C.K. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri R.K. Mishra, Dy. Adv. General Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 16/11/2016
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw both the writ petitions with liberty to prefer appeal in terms of the extant executive instructions.
2. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra.
Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra