Smt.Rameshwari Tandon v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 4283 of 2014 Smt.Rameshwari Tandon W/o Ravindra Kumar Tandon, Aged about 27 Years, Working as Auxiliary Nurse Mid Wife (ANM) at Primary Health Center, Singhoda, Block & Tahsil Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G., R/o Ward No. 2 near Shivalaya General Stores, Imlibhatha, P.S. Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

2. The Collector, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G.

3. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G.

4. The Block Medical Officer, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G.

5. The Block Medical Officer, Community Health Centre, Saraipali, Block Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G.

6. Smt. Khileshwari Netam working as Auxiliary Nurse Mid Wife (ANM) at Primary Health Centre, Singhoda, Block Tahsil Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund, C.G.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri U. N. S. Deo, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 18/09/2015 Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 15.07.2014 Annexure P-1 whereby the earlier transfer order issued on 14.07.2014 has been cancelled.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier order dated 14.07.2014 transferring the petitioner from Sub-Health Centre Singhoda, Block Saraipali to Community Health Centre Tumgaon, Block Mahasamund has already been acted upon and by virtue of an interim protection granted by this Court on 21.08.2014 the petitioner continues to

discharge her duties at the place where she was transferred by the earlier order dated 14.07.2014.

3.

At this juncture, on instruction, State counsel makes a submission that since the petitioner has an interim protection in her favour for over an year, the State as of now would not insist upon the execution of the impugned order. However, the State may be granted liberty to pass fresh order as and when the need so arises.

4.

In the light of the submission made by the State counsel, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon.

5.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed by the State counsel.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola