← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4297/2014disposed off

Manoj Kumar Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-09-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 4297 of 2014 Manoj Kumar Singh S/o Lt Shailendra Singh, Aged about 45 Years, Presently working as Patwari at Patwari Halka No.14, Baikunthpur, Dist Koriya, R/o Qtr No. 56, Shakuntala Colony, Baikunthpur, PS Baikunthpur, Dist Koriya, CG ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Revenue & Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Dist Raipur, CG

2. Joint Secretary, Department of Revenue & Disaster Management, State of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Dist Raipur, CG

3. The Collector, Distt Koriya, CG

4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Baikunthpur, Distt Koriya, CG

5. Bhaiya Lal Rajwade S/o Alisai Rajwade, Aged about 65 Years, Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA), Baikunthpur -03, R/o Village Saddi, Po & PS Churcha Coliery, Distt Koriya, CG ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri U. N. S. Deo, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 18/09/2015 Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 15.07.2014 Annexure P-1 whereby the services of the petitioner have been transferred from Baikunthpur, District Koriya to District Surajpur. 2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an interim order in favour of the petitioner passed by this Court on 21.08.2014 on account of which the petitioner continues to discharge his duties at the place where he was working before passing of the impugned order. 3.

At this juncture, on instruction, State counsel makes a submission that since the petitioner has an interim protection in his favour for over an year, the State as of now would not insist upon the execution of the

impugned order. However, the State may be granted liberty to pass fresh order as and when the need so arises.

4.

In the light of the submission made by the State counsel, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon.

5.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed by the State counsel.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola