Puhupram Naik v. Vimala Singh And Others

v, BEFORE THE'HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR First A ea! N0.

Of 2005.@/ 57g APPELLANT C/ 45'

I r Puhupram Nalk aged 50 years son of I PLAINTIFF 9§ / Punau Ram Nalk res1dent of Kududand P (3".

Bllaspur Tah & D1stt Bllaspur (C G) M&u\ x5., Ix u Present re31dent of GenerglMggggar Apex Bank, Ralpur, Tahs11 Ralpur, Dlstt.

Raipur (Chhattisgarh),

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS /,:-1.

Vimala Singh, wife 0f Shli D.P. Singh DEFENDENTS Thakur, resident of Chatterjee Gali, New J @ Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), /2 State ef Chhattisgerh, Through Collector, '

"

Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FA No. 97 of 2005 Puhupram Naik, Aged 5O years, S/o Punau Ram Naik, R/o Kududand, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District laspur (C.G.) Present R/o Managing Direct, Bi or Apex ank, Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Plaintiff) ---- Appellant

Versus

1.

Vimala Singh, W/o Shri D.P.

Singh Thakur, R/o Chatterjee Gali, New ur Sarkanda, Biiaspur, Tahsil & istrict Bilasp (C.G.) .G 2.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur (C.) (Defendants) ---- Respondents None For Appellant Shri Sudhir Agrawal & P.

For Respondent No.1 .\ utta, Advocates.

For Respondent o.2/State :

Shri Samir Behar, P.L.

N '

SB: Honble Shri Justice Awind Singh Chandel Order on Board -- 0908201 7 None for the appellant when the case is called out for hearing even in the second round and no representation is made on his behalf. 2.

ln View of the above, this Court is left with no option exoept to dismiss the instant appeal for want of prosecution.

3.

. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Arvind Singh Chandel l Judge