← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/148/2016dismissed

Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Funds v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-11-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPCR No. 148 of 2016

1. Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Funds Organization Through Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner ( A P F C), Block D Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar Pandri, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 492004

2. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner- 1, Regional Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Chhattisgarh, Block D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavasyik Parisar, Pandri, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 492004 ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Superintendent Of Police, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Devendra Nagar, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Karur Vysya Bank, Through Its Branch Manager, Branch Raipur, E P I Centre, Near Yashwant Hospital, Tatyapara, G. E. Road, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Through Its Company Secretary, Registered Office- B Wing, Ahura Centre, 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri ( E), Mumbai 400093 ( Maharastra State)

6. Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Unit: Rawan Cement Works, Post Office Grasim Vihar, Village Rawan, District Baloda Bazaar- Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh) 493196 ----Respondents 30/11/2016 Shri Sunil Pillai, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sangarsh Pandey, Dy.G.A. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition has become infructuous as the grievance has been redressed presently.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, petitioners will be at liberty to file again, if occasion so arises. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri