Naveen Kurrey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3037 of 2020 • Naveen Kurrey S/o Brijlal Kurrey Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Sundravan, Police Station Gidhpuri, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Station House OfÏcer, Police StationGidhpuri, DistrictBalodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Applicant :

Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Adv.

For Respondent/State :

Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 09/06/2020

1. The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 20/2020 registered at Police Station Gidhpuri, DistrictBalodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 366 and 376 of the IPC.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that, victim/complainant lodged a written report that on 02.01.2020 when the victim was alone at home the applicant came her home, seduced her and took her at the factory of Raipur, Urla and forcibly committed sexual intercourse with the victim. It is also alleged that applicant kept her one week at the said factory and every day committed sexual intercourse with her. Anyhow she managed the mobile phone, called her mother Premabai and narrated everything. Based on this offence has been registered against the present applicant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that charge-sheet has been

filed and the age of the prosecutrix is 20 years and the applicant is in jail since 19.03.2020, there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, therefore, the present applicant may be released on bail.

4. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the allegation against the applicant is of serious in nature, therefore, no case is made out for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, detention period of applicant and further considering that the applicant is in jail since 19.03.2020, and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

7. Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one local surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.

8. It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bond already furnished in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.03.2020 in the matter of In Re : Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Moto Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020), he need not furnish bail bond afresh and the bail bond already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bond furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if he has not furnished the bail bond earlier, then he will be required to furnish bail bond within four weeks from today. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge H.L. Sahu