← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1704/2016infructuous

Krishna Chandrakar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-12-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1704 of 2016 • Krishna Chandrakar S/o Panchram Chandrakar, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village /P. O. Sirsakala P. S. Bhilai-3, Tehsil Patan District Durg (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Urban Administration & Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Director/ Prescribed Authority, Department Of Urban Administration & Development, Indrawati Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

3. Collector, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh).

4. The Municipal Corporation Bhilai-Charoda, Through The Commissioner District Durg (Chhattisgarh).

5. State Election Commissioner, Through The Secretary Shastri Chowk, Old Mantralaya Parisar, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. UNS Deo, Government Advocate For Respondent No.4 Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 13/12/2016 1.

Heard.

2.

Admittedly, election to the ofÏce of Mayor and Corporators of Municipal Corporation, Bhilai Charoda, has already been notified, therefore, in view of the provisions contained in Article 243ZG of the Constitution of India , no interference is permissible at this stage. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner may prefer an Election Petition, if any permissible ground of challenge to the election is available to him in law. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna