Balram Prasad v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1313 of 2019

1. Balram Prasad S/o Mahesh Prasad Rathore Aged About 41 Years

2. Ramchandra S/o Mahesh Prasad Rathore Aged About 37 Years

3. Laxman Prasad S/o Mahesh Prasad Rathore Aged About 31 Years All are R/o Village Sukli, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi' Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Collector District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Offcer (Revenue) - Cum - Competent Authority National Highway No. 200 (New No. 49) Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

5. National Highways Authority of India through Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, National Road Area, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

6. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways, New Delhi. --- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent :

Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 5 & 6 :

Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B. Gopakumar, Asst. S.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 08.04.2019 1.

In the instant petition, the grievance raised by the petitioners is that the multiplier for grant of compensation as against the acquisition of land has not been properly applied and as per the order passed by the Division Bench and different orders of this Court, multiplier 2 should have been applied.

2.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that for the present the petitioners may be allowed to make a fresh representation in view of the order passed by this Court on 28.01.2019 in WPC No. 231/2019. 3.

Learned State Counsel does not object to filing of fresh representation, which may be decided by the State.

4.

In view of the above position, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners make a fresh representation within a period of four weeks from today along-with the copy of the order passed in WPC No. 231/2019, the concerned respondents shall consider and decide the same within a further period of six weeks from the date of presentation of copy of this order. Sd/- - (GOUTAM BHADURI) JUDGE Vishakha/ Rao