High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1941/2016disposed off

Subodh Shukla v. Smt. Shanti Tiwari

2017-03-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1941 of 2016 • Subodh Shukla S/o Late Shashi Shankar Shukla, Aged About 33 Years R/o Nayapara, Jagdalpur, Police Station And Post Jagdalpur, Civil And Revenue District Bastar, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Smt. Shanti Tiwari W/o K. R. Tiwari, Aged About 64 Years R/o Vardhaman Colony, Jagdalpur, Police Station And Post Jagdalpur, Civil And Revenue District Bastar, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Chhattisgarh State Women Commission, Raipur, Through: Its Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Women Commission, Raipur, Gayatri Bhawan, 13 Jal Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. President, State Women Commission, Raipur, Gayatri Bhawan, 13 Jal Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Superintendent Of Police, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh)

5. Police Station Bodhghat, Jagdalpur, Bastar, Through: Its Incharge Of Police Station, Bodhghat, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 9/3/2017

1. Heard.

2. The petitioner has assailed the order passed by the State

Women Commission, Raipur, by which, the Commission has directed the petitioner to vacate the tenanted premises on 31.7.2016.

3. In the return filed by the Commission as well as in the return filed by respondent No.1, it is stated that the Commission has already dropped/closed the complaint of respondent No.1 on 19.7.2016 for the reason that the Commission was not aware that respondent No.1 had already filed the eviction application before the Rent Controlling Authority, Jagdalpur under Section 11 of the C.G. Rent Control Act, 2011 and the same was allowed by the Rent Controlling Authority and further, an appeal, preferred by the petitioner against the order of Rent Controlling Authority, has been allowed by the State Rent Control Tribunal.

4. In view of the submission made in the return and since the impugned order has been withdrawn and the proceedings against the petitioner has been dropped by the Commission, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna